Alarm Customer Loses Insurance Claim Because No Automatic Fire Alarm in Service
Alarm customer [a restaurant in California] sued its insurance carrier to pay for a fire loss. The carrier refused to pay because the insurance policy included “a “Protective Safeguards” endorsement conditioning coverage for fire damage on Mama K’s maintaining an automatic fire alarm protecting the entire building.”
Alarm Customer Loses Insurance Claim Because No Automatic Fire Alarm in Service Read More »